Screen creators before you brief them.
Run historic creator libraries against your guidelines before you onboard. Screening is cheaper than a takedown.
Screening is cheaper than a takedown. Before you brief a creator, you want a read on historic content against the same rules you will apply to the work they make for you. Noodle4 runs those libraries against custom guidelines so brand, legal, and talent share one picture: what already exists, what would fail a review, and whether this is someone you want in the programme. The screening API is built for that volume.
Libraries, not a gut check
Historic clips against the same rules you will use on the campaign — before you send the brief.
Evidence, not a score
Where it would fail: speech, visual, caption, on-screen text. Legal can act without watching a year of content.
In the product
Historic
A year of content, not a reel. Screening is cheaper than a takedown.
Same rules
Campaign guidelines, early. Screening and approval are one system.
Evidence
See what would fail a live review, with where the issue sat.
Volume
API, not a watch party the week before live.
Screen before you brief
Brand, legal, and talent share one picture: what already exists, what would fail, and whether this is someone you want in the programme.
What it does
Same rules as review
Historic clips are checked against the guidelines you will use on the campaign, so screening and approval are one system.
Evidence, not a score
Decisions come back with where the issue sat — speech, visual, caption, on-screen text — so legal can act.
Cost that scales
The most accurate and cost-effective way to screen creators is not a person watching a year of content the week before live.
How it works
- 1. Guidelines — Load the rules the campaign will use.
- 2. Library — Run historic content for the shortlist.
- 3. Evidence — See what would fail a live review.
- 4. Brief — Onboard only the creators who clear it.
Who it is for
Talent
Shortlist against the same rules legal will apply after the work is made — before you send the brief.
Legal and brand safety
Historic speech, visual, caption, and on-screen text with evidence, not a gut check on a moodboard.
Agencies
Screen a roster at programme scale. The cost of watching a year of content the week before live does not hold.
Frequently asked questions
What is influencer screening?
A read on historic creator libraries against the same guidelines you will use on the campaign, before you brief or onboard. Screening is cheaper than a takedown.
Is screening the same as a content review?
Same rules, earlier. Historic clips are checked so talent, brand, and legal share one picture of what already exists and what would fail a live review.
Do we get a score or evidence?
Evidence. Decisions come back with where the issue sat — speech, visual, caption, on-screen text — so legal can act without watching a year of content.
Can we screen a whole roster through the API?
Yes. The screening API is built for programme volume. A person watching a year of content the week before live does not hold.